Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(dockerfiles/bases): upgrade pkgs to fix security issues #360

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 30, 2024

Conversation

wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo wuhuizuo@126.com

prepare file `br` to build image tidb-ligntning of release-6.5

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo <wuhuizuo@126.com>
Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo <wuhuizuo@126.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested a review from purelind July 30, 2024 12:41
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 30, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the PR title and description, it seems that the changes are related to upgrading packages in the Dockerfile to fix security issues. The changes include upgrading the base image, upgrading the Skaffold version, and making some modifications in the packages.yaml.tmpl file.

Upon reviewing the diff, the changes are straightforward and appear to be focused on upgrading packages to address security issues. However, there are some suggestions that can help improve the PR:

  • The commit message could be more descriptive, as it only states the action taken instead of explaining the reason behind it. A more detailed commit message can help other team members understand the purpose of the changes.

  • The packages.yaml.tmpl file has some lines that are not properly indented. It is advisable to fix the indentation to enhance the readability of the file.

  • It is also recommended to add some comments in the Dockerfile to explain the reason for the changes. This can help other team members understand why certain packages were upgraded and why the changes were necessary.

Overall, the changes seem reasonable, and there are no apparent problems. The suggestions provided are minor improvements that can help enhance the quality and readability of the code.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS label Jul 30, 2024
packages/packages.yaml.tmpl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 30, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request title and description, the key changes are upgrading packages to fix security issues. The changes include upgrading packages in the pingcap-base Dockerfile, upgrading Skaffold version to v1.9.1 in the skaffold.yaml file, and modifying the packages.yaml.tmpl file.

There don't seem to be any major potential problems with the changes, but here are a few suggestions for improvement:

  • It would be helpful to provide more information on the specific security issues being addressed with the package upgrades.
  • It is not clear why the tidb-lightning-ctl source is removed in the packages.yaml.tmpl file. Providing an explanation would be helpful for other team members who may review the pull request.
  • It is recommended to add some unit tests to ensure the changes don't break any existing functionality.

Overall, the changes appear to be reasonable and should be merged.

packages/packages.yaml.tmpl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 30, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the title and description of the pull request and the diff provided, it seems that the changes made in this pull request are related to upgrading packages in Dockerfiles to fix security issues. Specifically, the changes are upgrading the packages in the pingcap-base Dockerfile and updating the tag template in the skaffold.yaml file.

There doesn't seem to be any potential problems with these changes, as they are simply upgrading packages and updating a version number.

However, there are some suggestions for improvement. Firstly, it is best to explicitly specify the package versions being upgraded to, instead of just upgrading to the latest version. This will ensure that the Docker image is reproducible. Secondly, it would be good to provide more information about the security issues that are being fixed by these upgrades, either in the pull request description or in the commit message.

Therefore, I suggest the following changes to the pull request:

  • Explicitly specify the package versions being upgraded to in the pingcap-base Dockerfile.
  • Provide more information about the security issues being fixed in the pull request description or commit message.

@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 30, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Jul 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository, but no eligible user found. Please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit e0d0f29 into main Jul 30, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted the fix/pingcap-base-security branch July 30, 2024 12:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant